At 04:11 PM 12/31/2005 +0100, Paolo Ornati wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:13:24 +0100
Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ingo seems to have done something in 2.6.15-rc7-rt1 which defeats your
> little proggy. Taking a quick peek at the rt scheduler changes, nothing
> poked me in the eye, but by golly, I can't get this kernel to act up,
> whereas 2.6.14-virgin does.
Ok, I've sucessfully booted 2.6.15-rc7-rt1 (I think that I was
having troubles with Thread Softirqs and/or Thread Hardirqs).
First thing: I've preemption disabled, but it shouldn't matter too much
since we are talking about priority calculation...
Mine is fully preemptible.
1) My program isn't defeated at all. If I start it with the same args
of the previous examples it "seems" defeated, but it isn't.
Lowering the "cpu burn argument" I can reproduce the problem again:
"./a.out 200 & ./a.out 333"
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
5607 paolo 15 0 2396 320 252 R 56.1 0.1 0:06.79 a.out
5606 paolo 15 0 2396 324 252 R 38.7 0.1 0:04.55 a.out
1 root 16 0 2556 552 468 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.28 init
Strange. Using the exact same arguments, I do see some odd bouncing up to
high priorities, but they spend the vast majority of their time down at 25.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
