Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator

Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>
> 
> [snip]
> 
>>
>> Agree, I couldn't see nothing better for a basement of generic dev.
>> alloc.
>>
>> So, it will be much better if it will be moved to lib/.
>>
>> Anyone have some more comments about subj. ?
>>
> 
> Sure, but the call has to be made be a core developer.
> 
> Andrew?

Pantelis, what did you think about renaming rheap.c and rh_xxx, to
something like dev_xxx, since, for example, rh_alloc overlapped with
__rh_alloc (__RegionHach__alloc) in the drivers/md/dm-raid1.c.


-- 
Regards
Andrey Volkov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
    • From: Andrey Volkov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
    • From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
    • From: Andrey Volkov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
    • From: Pantelis Antoniou <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
    • From: Andrey Volkov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
    • From: Pantelis Antoniou <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
• Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] genalloc != generic DEVICE memory allocator
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]