Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup

On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 17:10 +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Daniel Walker wrote:
> > 
> >         Make the plist namespace consistent.
> 
> I think plist_head is much better than pl_head.
> 
> However I think plist_empty/plist_unhashed is more accurate
> than plist_head_empty/plist_node_empty, but I am rather
> agnostic to naming.

unhashed seems very meaningless . We're not hashing anything. 

> Daniel, it would be great if you can check that kernel/rt.o
> was not changed after rename (as it should be).

I didn't check, but I made no code changes so it should be any
different.

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Let non-root users eject their ipods?
• Next by Date: RE: scsi errors with dpt-i2o driver
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]