Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup

Daniel Walker wrote:
> 
>         Make the plist namespace consistent.

I think plist_head is much better than pl_head.

However I think plist_empty/plist_unhashed is more accurate
than plist_head_empty/plist_node_empty, but I am rather
agnostic to naming.

Ingo, do you have any preferences?

Daniel, it would be great if you can check that kernel/rt.o
was not changed after rename (as it should be).

Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 5/9] mutex subsystem, core
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 9/9] mutex subsystem, XFS namespace collision fixes
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]