Re: [patch] SMP alternatives

On Mer, 2005-11-23 at 13:36 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > have to add PAT support which we need to do anyway we would get a world
> > where on uniprocessor lock prefix only works on addresse targets we want
> > it to - ie pci_alloc_consistent() pages.
> 
> No. That would be wrong.
> 
> The thing is, "lock" is useless EVEN ON SMP in user space 99% of the time.

Now I see what you are aiming at, yes that makes vast amounts of sense
and since AMD have the "no lock effect" bit for general case maybe they
can


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/10] Cr4 is valid on some 486s
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/10] Cr4 is valid on some 486s
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/10] Cr4 is valid on some 486s
    • From: Gerd Knorr <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/10] Cr4 is valid on some 486s
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/10] Cr4 is valid on some 486s
    • From: Gerd Knorr <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/10] Cr4 is valid on some 486s
    • From: Gerd Knorr <[email protected]>
  • [RFC] SMP alternatives
    • From: Gerd Knorr <[email protected]>
  • [patch] SMP alternatives
    • From: Gerd Knorr <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c
• Next by Date: Re: Christmas list for the kernel
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]