Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Ok, I got a little bit more forward.
>
> I created entry like this:
> {
> .mfr_id = 0x00b0,
> .dev_id = 0x00b0,
> .name = "Collie hack",
> .uaddr = {
> [0] = MTD_UADDR_UNNECESSARY, /* x8 */
> },
> .DevSize = SIZE_4MiB,
> .CmdSet = P_ID_INTEL_EXT,
> .NumEraseRegions= 1,
> .regions = {
> ERASEINFO(0x10000,8),
> }
> }
>
> (Which is probably wrong, I just made up the data)
Shouldn't you get hold of the datasheet for the flash chips and fill in
this information correctly?
David Vrabel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: latest mtd changes broke collie
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: latest mtd changes broke collie
- References:
- latest mtd changes broke collie
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: latest mtd changes broke collie
- From: Todd Poynor <[email protected]>
- Re: latest mtd changes broke collie
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: latest mtd changes broke collie
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: latest mtd changes broke collie
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: latest mtd changes broke collie
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: latest mtd changes broke collie
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: latest mtd changes broke collie
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: latest mtd changes broke collie
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- latest mtd changes broke collie
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] handling 64bit values for st_ino]
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.14-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: latest mtd changes broke collie
- Next by thread: Re: latest mtd changes broke collie
- Index(es):
 |