Re: latest mtd changes broke collie

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pavel Machek wrote:
Latest mtd changes break collie...it now oopses during boot. This
reverts the bad patch.

What tree was this generated against? It doesn't seem to match recent linux-mtd or kernel.org trees. It looks like the tree used had different version of a couple fixes recently added to linux-mtd (removal of bogus udelays and 32-bit status datatype).

I'm guessing the important part is to add a missing spin_unlock_bh(), which is definitely a bug in the mtd code, but this code is so different than linux-mtd CVS that it seems more resyncing is needed. As it stands now, force-fitting this patch would still leave an unbalanced spin_lock_bh() without other changes. And it does look like this driver hasn't been converted to modern mtd apis.


Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/sharp.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/sharp.c
--- a/drivers/mtd/chips/sharp.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/sharp.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
  * Copyright 2000,2001 David A. Schleef <[email protected]>
  *           2000,2001 Lineo, Inc.
  *
- * $Id: sharp.c,v 1.16 2005/11/07 11:14:23 gleixner Exp $
+ * $Id: sharp.c,v 1.14 2004/08/09 13:19:43 dwmw2 Exp $
  *
  * Devices supported:
  *   LH28F016SCT Symmetrical block flash memory, 2Mx8
@@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
 #include <linux/mtd/cfi.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>
#define CMD_RESET 0xffffffff
 #define CMD_READ_ID		0x90909090
@@ -234,7 +233,7 @@ static int sharp_probe_map(struct map_in
 /* This function returns with the chip->mutex lock held. */
 static int sharp_wait(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip)
 {
-	int status, i;
+	__u32 status;
 	unsigned long timeo = jiffies + HZ;
 	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
 	int adr = 0;
@@ -247,11 +246,13 @@ retry:
 		map_write32(map, CMD_READ_STATUS, adr);
 		chip->state = FL_STATUS;
 	case FL_STATUS:
-		for(i=0;i<100;i++){
-			status = map_read32(map,adr);
-			if((status & SR_READY)==SR_READY)
-				break;
-			udelay(1);
+		status = map_read32(map,adr);
+		if ((status & SR_READY) == SR_READY)
+			break;
+		spin_unlock_bh(chip->mutex);
+		if (time_after(jiffies, timeo)) {
+			printk("Waiting for chip to be ready timed out in erase\n");
+			return -EIO;
 		}
 		sharp_udelay(1);
 		goto retry;
@@ -491,11 +492,7 @@ static inline int sharp_do_wait_for_read
 		spin_lock_bh(chip->mutex);
remove_wait_queue(&chip->wq, &wait);
-
-		if (signal_pending(current)){
-			ret = -EINTR;
-			goto out;
-		}
+		set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
 	}
 	ret = -ETIME;
 out:





--
Todd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux