Le Wednesday 09 November 2005 23:55, Bill Davidsen a écrit : | Thank you Rickard and Damir for reassuring me that this change is | highly unlikely to impact any of the connection methods I use. you're welcome comparing our two emails, you can see that Rickard is much better used to this matter than myself, as his email is more condense but has the same information as mine. (see also my signature in this email) | Since PCMCIA on desktops and non-udev systems are uncommon, I felt the | question was better mentioned before the patch went in. Occasionally | my confiurations do result in a "nobody would do that" reaction. well placed questions never hurt (some answers may, but that's another story :P )... and often other people find that they also wanted to know the answer but didn't dare to ask. greetings, Damir -- If it takes a lot of words to say what you have in mind, give it more thought. -- Dennis Roch
Attachment:
pgpsS09U8iTim.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: [patch] Re: 2.6.14-rc5-mm1 - ide-cs broken!
- From: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Re: 2.6.14-rc5-mm1 - ide-cs broken!
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Re: 2.6.14-rc5-mm1 - ide-cs broken!
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove read-only check from inode_update_time().
- Next by Date: Re: merge status
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Re: 2.6.14-rc5-mm1 - ide-cs broken!
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] Re: 2.6.14-rc5-mm1 - ide-cs broken!
- Index(es):
 |