On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 17:40 -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: > Prakash Punnoor wrote: > > > > >. But nevertheless it didn't survive, as like V3, with time V4 became > >slower and slower. In this case no year was needed, but just one month or > >alike. So end of test...but in fact I'll give V4 another go in the near future. > > > > > Interesting that it got slower with time. It sounds like our online > repacker is much needed. It will be a priority for after the kernel merge. I told y'all that last year on the reiserfs-list, with benchmarks :-) -- Zan Lynx <[email protected]>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: David Masover <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Horst von Brand <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: [email protected] (Markus Törnqvist)
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Steve Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Steve Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Prakash Punnoor <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- Prev by Date: Re: Problems with Firewire and -mm kernels (was: Re: 2.6.12-mm2)
- Next by Date: Re: dirty md raid5 slab bio leak
- Previous by thread: Re: reiser4 plugins
- Next by thread: Re: reiser4 plugins
- Index(es):
 |