Re: [RFC] SPI core -- revisited

On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 07:37 +0400, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> >
> > ... or just kill the wrappers entirely!
> >
> >  
> >
> Nothing's gonna work in DMA case if he kills the wrappers.

how is that??

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC] SPI core -- revisited
    • From: Vitaly Wool <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC] SPI core -- revisited
    • From: <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] SPI core -- revisited
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] SPI core -- revisited
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] SPI core -- revisited
    • From: Vitaly Wool <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [rfc] lockless pagecache
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.12: connection tracking broken?
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] SPI core -- revisited
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] SPI core -- revisited
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]