Re: [rfc] lockless pagecache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:
Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

Also, the memory usage regression cases that fault ahead brings makes it
a bit contentious.


faultahead consumes no more memory: if the page is present then point a pte
at it.  It'll make reclaim work a bit harder in some situations.


Oh OK we'll call that faultahead and Christoph's thing prefault then.

I suspect it may still be a net loss for those that are running into
tree_lock contention, but we'll see.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux