Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting

* Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks. task_curr is what we needed. Would exporting task_curr be ok 
> or should we continue to wrap in a separate function ?

wrapping a non-exported function and then exporting it is not nice at 
all (it circumvents the non-exported status of that original function).  
But we can internal-export (EXPORT_GPL) task_curr() itself.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting
    • From: Gerrit Huizenga <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 00/38] CKRM e18: Updated core patches to 2.6.12 and included e17 changes
    • From: Gerrit Huizenga <[email protected]>
  • [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting
    • From: Gerrit Huizenga <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: reiser4 plugins
• Next by Date: Re: reiser4 plugins
• Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting
• Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]