Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting

* Gerrit Huizenga <[email protected]> wrote:

> +#ifdef CONFIG_DELAY_ACCT
> +int task_running_sys(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +	return task_is_running(p);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(task_running_sys);
> +#endif

why is this function defined, and why is it exported?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 00/38] CKRM e18: Updated core patches to 2.6.12 and included e17 changes
    • From: Gerrit Huizenga <[email protected]>
  • [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting
    • From: Gerrit Huizenga <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: DEBUG_PAGEALLOC & SMP?
• Next by Date: Re: [ltp] Re: IBM HDAPS Someone interested?
• Previous by thread: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]