Re: [-mm PATCH] signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c

From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:28:23 +0200 (CEST)

> Fair enough, I'll split it into little bits and submit them one by one 
> with explanations. Not a problem at all.

Thanks a lot Jesper.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [-mm PATCH] signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
  - From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm PATCH] signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
  - From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm PATCH] signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
  - From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: PROBLEM: OOPSes in PREEMPT SMP for AMD Opteron Dual-Core with Memhole Mapping (non tainted kernel)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
Previous by thread: Re: [-mm PATCH] signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
Next by thread: lib unwind
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]