On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> I'm not merging this thing, at least no all at once.
>
> "size_t" vs. "unsigned int" vs. "int" length comparisons are where all
> the security problems come from in the protocol stack
>
> Therefore you should make a seperate patch for each type
> change you make and explain why it doesn't add some regression
> in terms of signedness issues.
>
Fair enough, I'll split it into little bits and submit them one by one
with explanations. Not a problem at all.
--
Jesper Juhl
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]