On Thu, 26 May 2005, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Would it make sense, Simon, to recommend to Andrew that
> he take the simple patch I submitted yesterday for this
> now, since it avoids a kernel crash and the risk of other
> uglies?
>
> Then, when we understand that improved scalability is needed,
> and we have agreed on a solution to that, offer up a second
> patch?
>
Of course !
> > I feel like this 'scaling problem' still exists even with:
> Can you back this feeling with numbers, with real measurements?
I don't.
My point is only that if you think there is a scaling problem in
taking cpuset_sem for each call to cpuset_exit(), that scaling problem
won't disappear by taking cpuset_sem only for 'notify_on_remove' cpusets,
as such cpusets might exist over the whole system.
Simon.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
