Would it make sense, Simon, to recommend to Andrew that
he take the simple patch I submitted yesterday for this
now, since it avoids a kernel crash and the risk of other
uglies?
Then, when we understand that improved scalability is needed,
and we have agreed on a solution to that, offer up a second
patch?
I don't mind doing fancier solutions if we need them, but
unless you sense we can obtain rapid agreement on something,
I don't think it's a good idea to avoid the simple fix, while
we are evaluating more complex solutions.
I for one do not have a sense of rapid agreement ;).
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
