On Friday 29 April 2005 17:52, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> * Without LKM_LOCAL:
> [root@ca-test7 ocfs2]# time tar -zxf /tmp/linux-2.6.11.7.tar.gz
>
> real 0m39.699s
> user 0m3.644s
> sys 0m8.076s
>
> * With LKM_LOCAL
> [root@ca-test7 ocfs2]# time tar -zxf /tmp/linux-2.6.11.7.tar.gz
>
> real 0m22.076s
> user 0m3.869s
> sys 0m7.234s
>
> So yes, I'd say it's worth a significant amount of performance to us :)
To be precise, LKM_LOCAL saves you 44%, and even without LKM_LOCAL you turn in
a respectable number. Could you please provide your node, shared disk and
network specs?
Because I am greedy, I would like to have seen the Ext3 number, too. And oh
yes, the Ext2 number!
Regards,
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
