compdoc wrote: >>My enet I/F on the host used to be eth1. >>Now it says it's the bridge br0. Is this as expected? > > Well, the interfaces are doing exactly what you specified in the ifcgf > scripts. I dunno if that's what you expected or not... > > When I use bridges, I don't let the interface or the bridge obtain an IP > address since they don't need them. But I can't tell what you're doing with > the bridge. > > Is there no eth0? > > > > There is nothing plugged in to eth0. My uplink is eth1. The bridge is only for use by virtual machines on this same box. Should I have configured it differently? -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines