Re: Do I have libbigloo* drivers linked incorrectly?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:04:59 -0600
"Robert G. (Doc) Savage" <dsavage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Lately every time I update my system I see umpteen cycles of messages
> complaining about a group of files that are "not a symbolic link":
> 
> /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libbigloosrfi27_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic
> link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libbigloocrypto_es-3.4a.so is not a
> symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libbigloothread_es-3.4a.so is
> not a symbolic
> link 

[snip]
 
> Each of these loops takes a noticeable amount of time -- especially on
> this old 32-bit system. Thirty-two iterations of this loop add
> substantially to the total update time. I see counterpart messages
> when updating a 64-bit system.

Are you sure it is the warnings that are taking the time?  When
ldconfig is run, it has to go through the libraries and that takes
time.  Perhaps you are associating that time with the warning messages.

> 
> When I look at all the libbigloo* files in /usr/lib, the *_u-3.4a.so
> files are soft linked to *_s-3.4a.so files. There are also
> *_eu-3.4a.so and *_es-3.4a.so versions of those files available for
> linking.
> 
> Do I have the correct links?

This is a bigloo issue, known but apparently harmless except for the
issues you raise above.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628799
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux