Re: ipv6 question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/02/2011 06:08 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Genes MailLists <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  There was some earlier discussion (mainly about NAT being now
>> irrelevant in the face of ipv6).
>>
>>  Question for you experts:
>>
>>   How does one manage your internal ip6 network so that an ISP change
>> (which under NAT/ipv4 is irrelevant) - is straightforward/clean to manage ?
>>
>>  thanks!
>>
> 
> becoming a autonomous system (AS) ?
> 
> 

  For a large company maybe - but no way phone/cable/google company is
gonna route everyone to their own private AS - or are you telling me
different?

  With ip4 + nat - isp changes are bog trivial ... are we saying this is
a royal pain in the patoot under ip6 ? Assuming we keep ip6 internally
... maybe we just keep ip4 internally and only use ip6 on the border/dmz
firewalls ?


-- 
users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux