Re:

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Actually, btw, I wrote to "Globe Trotter" and s/he was quite taken aback
because s/he said that s/he had unsubscribed from the list some time
ago. S/He also said that s/he would follow my suggestion and change
his/her password. But, I was thinking, what is the guarantee that the
"fake" poster e-mailed using his/her password. Is it that difficult to
spoof an e-mail address and post pretending from there?

I think the Fedora list may allow posts from unsubscribed individuals.
Perhaps these people could be made to go through a moderated process?

S/He was very apologetic to me and, by extension, to others on the list.

Ranjan

On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:38:18 -0600 Patrick O'Callaghan
<pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 14:12 -0500, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> > On 11/29/2010 10:45 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 07:49 -0500, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> > >> On 11/29/2010 06:29 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > >>> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 02:12 -0800, Globe Trotter wrote:
> > >>>> http://la-felce.it/index808.php
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>       
> > >>> Isn't it time to ban this idiot?
> > >>>
> > >>> poc
> > >>>
> > >> The problem here is that the user's yahoo password has been hacked. I
> > >> have seen this exact same thing with other yahoo, gmail and aol
> > >> addresses.  The user needs to change his/her yahoo password to clear
> > >> this up.
> > > If the user is a genuine member of the list, by now they should have
> > > noticed the crap being sent in their name and done something about it.
> > >
> > > If they aren't, why do we care about banning them?
> > >
> > > Even if they are genuine and for some reason haven't noticed the
> > > problem, banning them only means they'll get a reject from Mailman,
> > > whereupon they have the opportunity of appealing to the list admin.
> > We shouldn't. The user should be unsubscribed from the list, certainly,
> > removing any user who violates list policy either knowingly or
> > unknowingly should be removed.
> 
> Are you *quite* sure about that? The only policy as such is contained in
> the list guidelines, which are regularly violated with impunity (and
> those of us who complain are often subjected to name-calling for our
> pains), but getting medieval with any and all violators is unlikely to
> lead to a more congenial list on the whole.
> 
> > Banning a person from the list would
> > require listadmin approval to rejoin. It just requires more work for the
> > listadmin.
> 
> Maybe. Presumably spammers wouldn't bother arguing with the admin, but
> they probably wouldn't bother resubscribing either.
> 
> poc
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> 
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux