On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 15:37:12 -0300, > Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 14:48:52 -0300, >> > Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> A full Linux installation in a VM doesn´t already include all >> >> copyright and licenses inside the VM file?. >> > >> > If you distribute binaries, you need to make source code available as well. >> > There are a few ways to do that and you want to make sure you are doing at >> > least one of them. >> >> The source code is already provided by the distro distributed. A VM is >> just a repackaging of the distro, in its installed form. > > You can't always point to the distro you are derived from for sources. There > are cases where you can, but I am not sure that this is one. Arguably you > might also need to provide the source for the build scripts for making the VM > image. What scripts? Virtualbox provides a menu option titled "Export VM Appliance". There are no scripts. FC -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
