Re: missing packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/13/2010 05:02 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> On 11/13/2010 06:08 PM, JD wrote:
>> On 11/13/2010 12:56 PM, Kam Leo wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:11 PM, JD<jd1008@xxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:jd1008@xxxxxxxxx>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>      On 11/13/2010 11:48 AM, fred smith wrote:
>>>      >  On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:56:31AM -0800, JD wrote:
>>>      >>  yum check
>>>      >>  reports missing packages.
>>>      >>  Is there a way to yum install missing packages
>>>      >>  without having to specify their names?
>>>      >  I suppose you could capture to a file, the list yum gives of missing
>>>      >  packages, then edit the file til it looks like a yum
>>>      commandline, then
>>>      >  run it.
>>>      >
>>>      Yeah   I know that.
>>>      I was hoping that there is an incantation of yum
>>>      or a package manager to go and fetch and install
>>>      missing packages.
>>>      Thanx for the suggestion.
>>>
>>>
>>> If the missing packages are dependencies and are available they will
>>> be automatically pulled in when you run yum.
>> I did yum update and yum says:
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> Setting up Update Process
>> No Packages marked for Update
> yum check
>
> lists the packages that you have installed that do not have all of their
> required dependencies installed.
>
> How can this be?  One possibility that pops to mind is that you have
> some "old" packages installed of which their dependencies have been
> upgraded, but your "old" packages list the dependencies as ='s installed
> of>='s.  This seems to be a rather common problem with certain
> packages, and make updating them problematic.
>
> It happens.  I have a couple of f12 packages on my (now) f14 laptop that
> require (for example) python-abi = 2.6.  But, Python on f14 is now 2.7.
>
> Your choices at this point are limited:
>
> 1)  remove the old packages with the dependency problems.  If you cannot
> find current packages, maybe you can rebuild them from source.
>
> 2)  assume that the old packages will work with the newer versions of
> its dependencies.  (Always a risk.)
>
> 3)  find/install the old dependencies.  (I do not recommend this option
> except as a last resort, as there is no guarantee that the old
> dependencies and the newer version of them can co-exist, and it may
> require you to "force" some installations leading to further database
> problems down the road).
>
You hit the nail on the head!
I think I will have to let go of some packages that
require
pkgXYZ-1.2.3
and other packages that require
libpkgXYZ-2.1.0

They come from different repos.
Each package is needed by something I would like to install,
but both ....XYZ packages provide the same libs, but of different
vintage and name.
Just disgusting :) :)
Perhaps over time, different distros will become SO different,
that any hope of building even a source from one distro
on another distro will be severely frustrated.

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux