Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Actually I'd say that so far it hasn't really panned out, for the same > reason that general-purpose hardware defeated those special-purpose > machines I mentioned: the market is too small for them so development is > relatively slow, thus the apparent attractions of "doing it in hardware" > aren't enough to compensate, i.e. by the time you get your special > machine out the door the now-standard off-the-shelf parts can knock the > socks off it. The exception that proves the rule is graphics cards, > where there is a huge market that makes the special-purpose hardware > worthwhile. The other reason is that on-chip caches have gotten so fast that going to main memory is a huge bottleneck. Even with the caches doing multi-row reads of the adjacent DRAM memory locations, it still isn't easy to keep the cache filled for memory intensive operations like pattern search or block move. Special search hardware in the cpu would be fixing the part of the problem that is already faster than the supporting hardware. -wolfgang -- Wolfgang S. Rupprecht http://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/ (IPv6-only) -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
