JB wrote: > Frantisek Hanzlik<franta<at> hanzlici.cz> writes: > >> >> After fresh Fedora install (from Fedora repo only) I found in >> "/var/log/messages" records as: >> >> Oct 1 07:08:26 ns kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> Oct 1 07:08:26 ns kernel: WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:791 >> check_unmap+0x7a/0x59b() >> Oct 1 07:08:26 ns kernel: Hardware name: EP45-DQ6 >> Oct 1 07:08:26 ns kernel: dl2k 0000:09:00.0: DMA-API: device driver >> tries to free an invalid DMA memory address >> Oct 1 07:08:26 ns kernel: Modules linked in: bluetooth rfkill >> nf_nat_ftp nf_conntrack_ftp iptable_nat nf_nat xt_u32 ipt_LOG xt_limit >> uinput iTCO_wdt i2c_i801 iTCO_vendor_support r8169 mii i2c_core dl2k >> microcode raid1 [last unloaded: hwmon_vid] >> Oct 1 07:08:26 ns kernel: Pid: 2454, comm: ip Tainted: G W >> 2.6.35.4-28.fc14.i686.PAE #1 >> Oct 1 07:08:26 ns kernel: Call Trace: >> Oct 1 07:08:26 ns kernel: [<c0441f39>] warn_slowpath_common+0x6a/0x7f >> ... >> Oct 1 07:08:26 ns kernel: ---[ end trace a70d91368aa35943 ]--- >> >> Oops itself is probably suited for bug report, but what isn't clear for >> me is line >> Oct 1 07:08:26 ns kernel: Pid: 2454, comm: ip Tainted: G W >> 2.6.35.4-28.fc14.i686.PAE #1 >> >> Which module caused that kernel is tainted? I suppose Fedora contains >> only open SW including kernel modules, isn't then there something wrong? >> >> Thanks, Franta Hanzlík > > Hi, > an answer from test mailing list. > > From kernel doc > > " 1: 'G' if all modules loaded have a GPL or compatible license, 'P' if > any proprietary module has been loaded. Modules without a > MODULE_LICENSE or with a MODULE_LICENSE that is not recognised by > insmod as GPL compatible are assumed to be proprietary. > " > > " 10: 'W' if a warning has previously been issued by the kernel. > (Though some warnings may set more specific taint flags.) > " > > JB Hello Miss JB, i just found your answer, as you wrote it, in kernel-doc Fedora RPM package (/usr/share/doc/stable.knl/Documentation/oops-tracing.txt). I previous had some phantasy how should be "desperate" tainting module dislosured - but it was probable other kernel in other universe. Thanks -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
