On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 11:18 -0700, JD wrote: > > Not to be mean or anything....So please take it lightly: > Did I say linux has issues in supporting large smp? NO! > You are answering your own question. not mine. ... > Did I say anything about application support? No! > Again, you are answering your own question. > > I have found a few articles mentioning the smp granularity, > but do not discuss the linux smp implementation within the > context of granularity and overhead, and optimum degree > of granularity. Might be a language barrier on my part, but by your question, it wasn't apparent (at least not to me) if you're talking the locking granularity inside the Linux kernel (read: A theoretical question) or application performance running on Linux. As you talked about actual hardware (AMD Opteron CPU with 12 cores), I -assumed- that you were talking about application performance. -However-, saying "Taking it lightly" doesn't excuse you from "being excellent to each other" rule. Your answer was rude and uncalled for. - Gilboa -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
