Darr <darr <at> core.com> writes: > > I agree that 3 primaries don't need to be used before an extended partition > is created for logical volumes (I've done 1 primary and 1 extended before, > too), but why is there no /sda4 ? > > i.e. If the extended partition was /sda2 would the first logical volume > *still* be /sda5? > Hi, this is my system: # cfdisk cfdisk (util-linux-ng 2.17.2) Disk Drive: /dev/sda Size: 40007761920 bytes, 40.0 GB Heads: 255 Sectors per Track: 63 Cylinders: 4864 Name Flags Part Type FS Type [Label] Size (MB) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ sda1 Boot Primary NTFS [^B] 21436.05* sda2 Primary Linux ext3 [F13] 8388.61* sda3 Primary Linux ext3 [F11] 7605.21* sda5 Logical Linux swap / Solaris 1501.84* sda6 Logical Linux ext2 [save] 1076.07* ... # fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: 40.0 GB, 40007761920 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4864 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x3db012b3 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 2607 20933608+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda2 2607 3626 8192000 83 Linux /dev/sda3 3626 4551 7426960 83 Linux /dev/sda4 4551 4864 2517480 5 Extended /dev/sda5 4551 4734 1466608+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda6 4734 4864 1050808+ 83 Linux Note that fdisk shows Extended partition as sda4, but cfdisk skips it. It is a matter of formatting the displays by both. The layouts were done by these Linux utilities. In case of Paul's layout there is some inconsistency, and that's why I originally wanted to fill in the missing primary partitions. I wonder if mixing various formatters (Windows, Linux's cfdisk, fdisk, gparted/ parted, etc) has any impact on that. I remember once using gparted and it behaved differently from the cfdisk/fdisk utilities in regard to display and reorganization of a layout. I am not able to answer this question authoritatively. # fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: 100.0 GB, 100030242816 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 12161 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0xa8a8a8a8 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 4462 35840983+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda2 4463 4717 2048287+ e W95 FAT16 (LBA) /dev/sda3 4718 12162 59793409 5 Extended Partition 3 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sda5 4718 5961 9989120 83 Linux /dev/sda6 5962 8094 17133291 83 Linux /dev/sda7 11919 12162 1951744 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda8 8095 11918 30716248+ c W95 FAT32 (LBA) I am reading a web document about partitioning right now. It is about Windows FDISK and paragraph 5 is noteworthy: Keep in mind that there are NO written rules and NO industry standards on how FDISK should work but here are some basic rules that seem to be followed by most versions of FDISK: ... 5. The partition table entries (slots) can be used in any order. Some versions of FDISK fill the table from the bottom up and some versions of FDISK fill the table from the top down. Deleting a partition can leave an unused entry (slot) in the middle of a table. ... So, every OS will do it a little bit differently -:) . JB -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines