On 07/19/2010 05:51 PM, David wrote: > On 7/19/2010 7:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > >> Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700, >>> Michael Miles<mmamiga6@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to >>>> be the wrong one published by RPMfusion. >>>> >>> Fedora doesn't produce the kmod. You really should be asking about this on >>> the RPMfusion mailiing lists. >>> >> This is true, but to the extent that some people can't use the recent kernel >> until a working video driver is available, it is a Fedora issue. Updates which >> have security implications really shouldn't have to run in R/L 3 as text only. I >> don't need 3D accelerated anythings to run a few simple xterms and load >> monitoring, but not having X at all is an upgrade stopper. I'm running radeon, >> but more than a few systems which ran well on FC9 need to use VESA modes or even >> a laptop a VNC. The support for ATI and Nvidia hardware only a few years old is >> spotty at best. >> >> Good suggestion, though, he won't get any help here. >> > > Obviously the previous kernel worked correct? Why not use that one? > > > I am using the previous kernel. I just like to keep up and it is a update I would like to know why the kmod is for a driver that does not exist. 195.36.31-2 is the driver and the kmod for this driver and new kernel 195.36.31-1 which ends with the wrong number Even the kmod for the previous kernel is mismatched and ends with -1 instead of -2 Michael -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
