On 06/25/2010 02:04 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 06/24/2010 10:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >> I can't help wondering, not for the first time, whether LVM is really >> worth the hassle on a desktop machine. > > Depends, I am inclined to say. > > It's worth the hassle on real desktops, which I may be added further > disks over their life-time. It's not worth the hassle on systems which > will not be added further disks (such as laptops). > > That said, I can't help wondering why Fedora's installer doesn't offer a > "partitioned disk-layout" (like other distros do) and why Fedora hasn't > adopted grub2, yet (like some other distros did). grub2 is available in the repositories. Use it at your own discretion.... And for the partitioning schemes, feel free to change them. I have. I've punted LVM, and I've punted /boot on all of my computers (I don't need/want either of them). That's 1 desktop, 1 laptop, and 1 server. > Ralf -- Kevin J. Cummings kjchome@xxxxxxx cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
