Re: CUPS: PostScript vs. PCL3 vs PCL6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 23:46 -0400, Steve Snyder wrote:
> To sum up:
>  
> RHEL Server:    CUPS(PS) --> CP4025
>  
> Windows:        driver(PCL6) --> Samba --> CUPS --> CP4025
>  
> Fedora{12,13}:  driver(PCL3) --> IPP --> CUPS --> CP4025
>  
> On initial testing, it all seems to work.  What nags at me, though,
> are the 3 different methods of page description.  Am I wrong to think
> that mixing PostScript, PCL3 and PCL6 is a problem waiting to happen?

You should be able to just send PostScript to your print server, and not
need drivers for specific printers on the clients.

Sending locally pre-rendered data can be a problem, because you don't
want the server to try re-rendering.

-- 
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux