thanks for your answer well i have the problem when i don't set up ldap_user_search_base and ldap_group_search_base but i discovered that ou=Groups,dc=int-evry,dc=fr contains nothing our posix group are elsewhere and when i put ldap_group_search_base with the good value i have the problem again i guess i have to talk to the ldap guy to see if the data are correctly indexed. do u know what i should index on group? Le 10/06/2010 13:12, Stephen Gallagher a écrit : > On 06/10/2010 05:50 AM, Eric Doutreleau wrote: >> ahhh i took a day to write the mail and i found the solution 5 minutes >> just after write the mail >> >> i add >> ldap_group_search_base = ou=Groups,dc=int-evry,dc=fr >> and it s far faster >> >> sorry to have disturbed >> > > Hmm, this shouldn't have had a direct effect. If unspecified, > ldap_group_search_base should default to being the same as > ldap_search_base. Unless your LDAP server is incredibly large (and no > indexing is being performed), setting this should not have a measurable > effect. The primary purpose for this option is for LDAP deployments > where users and groups are in vastly disparate sections of the tree. > > I'm more concerned that there's a bug in our processing when only one of > the two options is specified. I'm CCing one of our upstream QE engineers > to try and reproduce your original performance issue. I think you may > have found a bug here. > > Eric, if you would also be willing to try it, I'm curious if you still > see this problem with only ldap_search_base specified (without > ldap_user_search_base and ldap_group_search_base) > > > -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
