> Hmm, that sounds a bit snide. No one has actually filed bug reports about > those issues, so I'm not sure how crucial they are. But that's a side > issue... I don't consider such omissions bugs, I thought they may have been deliberate design decisions. By crucial I of course meant crucial for me and my wife which may not mean a lot for every one else. > > gThumb 2.11.x is a complete rewrite compared to 2.10.x, and is in active > development. The re-write was necessary to remove a lot of crufty old code, > and to migrate to new technologies (plugins, gio/gvfs, xmp support, embedded > thumbnail support for speed, etc...) > > Not all features have been re-implemented yet (in particular, the web album > tool). I have added bug reports for your pet crucial features: > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620955 > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620956 > > You might want to subscribe to those bugs. > > gThumb 2.11.x also allows you to write extensions to implement your own > special features and contribute them back to the community. > > http://live.gnome.org/gthumb/extensions Thanks for the explanations. For now I downgraded to gthumb 2.10.something from F12. Peter -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
