Re: RPMs in FC13 with wrong or missing release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:05 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> There are a number of packages in the FC13 repos that have wrong or
> missing release IDs.  For example: 
>         evolution-remove-duplicates-0.0.4-4.fc12.x86_64
> which is in fact intended for evolution-2.28, and not for
> evolution-2.30, which is included in FC13.  (And so it doesn't work)
> 
> There are a lot of such packages and many packages with no release ID at
> all, like:
>         glibc-common-2.12-1.x86_64
> too many to be included in an email of reasonable length, but here is a
> summary:
>         $ wc -l *
>          1416 rpm.ALL		Number of RPMs on the system
>           220 rpm.fc12		Those with ".fc12." in their name 
>            17 rpm.none		Those with neither ".fc12." nor ".fc13."
> 
> Is this harmful?  Should it be reported to the Fedora Bugzilla?
----
not all packages are rebuilt with every release so it is probably not
unusual for a package that has an fc12 designation that is still working
with fc13.

I would think that any of them that don't work properly with current F13
release you should file an individual bugzilla entry for (ie evolution
remove duplicates package and the package will be notified).

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux