Thx for your feedback, I am continuing to look harder at this puzzle... On 04/29/2010 12:16 AM, Dan Irwin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:15 AM, jack craig<jcraig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:26:18:FE:75:91 >> inet addr:10.0.0.100 Bcast:11.255.255.255 Mask:254.0.0.0 >> inet6 addr: fe80::226:18ff:fefe:7591/64 Scope:Link >> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> RX packets:8291136 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >> TX packets:8464483 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 >> RX bytes:8084873362 (7.5 GiB) TX bytes:8107599565 (7.5 GiB) >> Interrupt:35 >> >> > I forgot to add this. > > I don't know why your ifcfg-eth0 does not match your real eth0. But > the addresses are all technically correct on eth0, even if that's not > what is in ifcfg-eth0. > > Cheers, > > Dan > -- Jack Craig Software Engineer 831.461.7100 x120 www.extraview.com -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
