On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 19:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 04/18/2010 07:06 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > > > As I sometimes am, I am confused by what you say Rahul. The question is > > not whether Red Hat has a right to replace programs by new ones created > > by another different team of volunteers. They do. > > > > I wasn't answering you. It was a reply to Tom Horsley. > > > My question is why call the new project seahorse a name which would be > > hard to associate with what the program does. Is there some reason that > > the new program could not keep the same name or at least a more > > meaningful name? > > > > Two projects obviously can't have the same name. The name is a word > play. Developers can pick whatever name they want. If you don't like > it, feel free to talk to them. Downstream distributions have no say on > that. On the other hand, we do have control over the descriptions in the RPM packages. When this issue came up last fall, I filed a bug to make sure that the word "keyring" appeared in the description field for seahorse, so that it would at least show up in the results of 'yum search keyring'. That bug has not been acted on since I filed it. I just updated the version to 12. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536945 > > Rahul > -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
