Re: Evolution and GPG signing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
<pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 08:12 +0000, mike cloaked wrote:
>> I do now know that if sending a plaintext mail from Evo to TB then the
>> signature verifies just fine, but changing to sending HTML but
>> otherwise leaving everything else the same then TB says it is a BAD
>> signature.  The question I do not know is whether the signature
>> verification in TB has a bug, or whether Evo does not form the
>> PGP/Mime mail correctly when sending HTML?
>
> Can TB verify Evo's signed message in your Sent folder? Can gpg verify
> it, independantly of TB?
>
> If they can, but won't verify the received message, then possibly
> somewhere along the line the HTML is being reflowed or in some way
> modified, which would destroy the signature. I can't really see how that
> could happen, but just to eliminate it as a possibility, try saving both
> the sent mail and the received mail to files and do a simple diff on
> them.

I will try and test as you suggest this evening when I have finished
with $DAYJOB for today....

-- 
mike c
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux