On 03/11/2010 04:37 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:20:04 -0800 > Joe Conway wrote: > >> So I can at least work around the issue this way after starting the VM, >> but still don't understand the root cause. > > The vnet0 may be coming from the "default" network that libvirt > provides. If you are using bridging for everything, you can > eradicate the default network like so: That's the weird thing -- br0 has mtu == 576 before vnet0 even exists, right after booting up, and even though the only existing interface attached, eth0, has mtu == 1500. Also worth noting is this all worked perfectly up until 2 days ago, and the only system changes have been due to "yum update" (I looked at /var/log/yum.log but nothing jumped out as an obvious cause). > virsh net-destroy default > virsh net-undefine default > > Getting rid of the default also gets rid of the dnsmasq process > libvirt starts and other cruft you don't need for pure bridging > (like insane junk added to iptables). Unfortunately: virsh # net-destroy default error: failed to get network 'default' error: Network not found: no network with matching name 'default' virsh # net-list Name State Autostart ----------------------------------------- (There are none listed) Joe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines