Hi y'all, I have the habit of compiling kernels from Linus' tree once in a while. The list of installed kernels on my AA64 Fedora 12 machine looks like so : [arares@localhost ~]$ ls /boot | grep vmlinuz vmlinuz vmlinuz-2.6.31.12-174.2.22.fc12.x86_64 vmlinuz-2.6.31.5-127.fc12.x86_64 vmlinuz-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64 vmlinuz-2.6.33-00001-gbaac35c vmlinuz-2.6.33-05070-g64ba992 vmlinuz-2.6.33-05679-g4da0b66 vmlinuz-2.6.34-rc1-00005-g522dba7 Now, the first vanilla kernel (aka the oldest) works OK with nouveau, and the Fedora-supplied ones do the same. However, the other vanilla kernels fail to show me a nice gdm screen, and after some flickering, leave the following in my logs : 195 (II) [drm] DRM interface version 1.3 196 (II) [drm] DRM open master succeeded. 197 (II) NOUVEAU(0): [drm] nouveau interface version: 0.0.16 198 (EE) NOUVEAU(0): [drm] wrong version, expecting 0.0.15 199 (EE) NOUVEAU(0): 879: 200 (II) UnloadModule: "nouveau" 201 (II) UnloadModule: "dri" 202 (II) UnloadModule: "int10" 203 (II) Unloading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libint10.so 204 (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. 205 206 Fatal server error: 207 no screens found 208 209 Please consult the Fedora Project support (the line numbers are from my vim, sorry). So, the question is : should I file this as a bug in kernel's bugzilla or in Fedora's? Thank you. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
