Re: NetworkManager vs Cacheing nameserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 05:17 +0100, Tom H wrote:
> >> How does one convince NM not to interfere with resolv.conf?
> 
> > Don't know for sure how to make interfaces managed by NM
> > stop doing it, but for my non-NM system I still have to
> > prevent resolv.conf from being scrogged by setting
> > PEERDNS=no
> > in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 file.
> 
> resolv.conf is overwritten by dhclient, whether the interface is is
> NM-managed or not, so your "PEERDNS=no" solution will work for the OP.
> 

That seems to be working for the moment, but there's an element of magic
in it that makes me nervous. The default named.conf file is set up as a
simple cacheing nameserver for local queries, but where does named do
its recursive lookups if not from the DHCP service?

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux