Re: any fundamental difference between fedora and suse NFSv4?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Ed Greshko wrote:

> FWIW, I've not spent any time trying to get a pure nfs4 environment.
> IMHO, it doesn't buy anything.

  i'm willing to agree.  my interest was more in stress testing the
setup to see if it would work the way the docs claimed.  i was curious
to see if, when one selects a pure NFSv4 environment, whether any
legacy NFSv3 cruft got dragged along for the ride.  when something
like that happens, you can get annoyingly obscure errors.

  anyway, i think we've established that some cleanup could be done.
i created the initial BZ report here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552144

so people are welcome to add any further comments there.  i'll
probably add one more comment summarizing what i think i've figured
out.

rday
--


========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

            Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux