On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Timothy Murphy <gayleard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As far as I can see, the poster was not objecting to LVM per se; > he was simply asserting that it should not be the default, > which I agree with. The original objection was mine, and that is absolutely correct. Just because some technology exists, is not a good and sufficient reason to use it as a default. LVM brings nothing but confusion to most users. -- Marc Wilson msw@xxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
