Re: Fedora 12 bad checksums

• To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Fedora 12 bad checksums
• From: Greg Woods <woods@xxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:47:13 -0700
• In-reply-to: <20091117202501.GN4509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <1258488676.5208.108.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091117202501.GN4509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 15:25 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:

> 
> The checksum used i SHA256, not SHA1.  

I got confused because the CHECKSUM file explicitly states:

Hash: SHA1

But maybe that is for the PGP key?

--Greg


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Fedora 12 bad checksums
    • From: Paul W. Frields

• References:
  • Fedora 12 bad checksums
    • From: Greg Woods
  • Re: Fedora 12 bad checksums
    • From: Todd Zullinger

• Prev by Date: Re: upgrading i686 F11 -> x86-64 F12
• Next by Date: Re: f12 preupgrade?
• Previous by thread: Re: Fedora 12 bad checksums
• Next by thread: Re: Fedora 12 bad checksums
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread