Re: Attempt to build kernel under fc11 x86_64 fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Reg Clemens <reg@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Reg Clemens <reg@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > I have just brought up 64bit fc11, done a 'yum update' to bring it up to
>> > date with the current changes, and am trying to build the 2.7.31.6 kernel.
>> >
>> > This is my first try at a 64bit OS, so I may be doing something stupid.
>> >
>> > I see a number of compile errors/warnings, but the most significant seem
>> > to be near the end of the build of the modules, where I see:
>> >
>> > ---
>> >
>  << snip >>
>>
>> You've installed the 64-bit version of Fedora 11. So naturally the
>> glibc that was installed is also 64-bit.
>>
>> Are you trying to compile a 32-bit kernel? Then you need to install
>> the 32-bit version of glibc.
>
> Nope, trying to build a 64bit kernel.
>>
>> Can you do a "rpm -qa | grep glibc"  and paste the output here?
>>
> Here is that result:
>
> [reg@deneb ~]$ rpm -qa | grep glibc
> glibc-headers-2.10.1-5.x86_64
> glibc-common-2.10.1-5.x86_64
> glibc-2.10.1-5.x86_64
>
>> When you install 32-bit glibc, the file ld-linux.so.2 will be
>> installed. Presently it is not.
>>
>> Can you do a search for ld-linux.so.2 by using the following command?
>>
>> # find / -name ld-linux.so.2
>>
>
> [root@deneb reg]# !!
> find / -name ld-linux.so.2 -print
> [root@deneb reg]#
>
> Nope, not found, looking at my fc10 (32bit) this is a symbolic link pointing
> to ld-2.10.so in the same directory.  Looking at /lib, thats not there either.
>
> In a 2nd email, you asked for
>
>> Can you also do a "head -n 15 .config"?
>
> Here is that listing.
>
> [root@deneb linux-2.6.31.6-PPS]# head -n 15 .config
> #
> # Automatically generated make config: don't edit
> # Linux kernel version: 2.6.31.6-PPS
> # Sun Nov 15 18:49:16 2009
> #
> CONFIG_64BIT=y
> # CONFIG_X86_32 is not set
> CONFIG_X86_64=y
> CONFIG_X86=y
> CONFIG_OUTPUT_FORMAT="elf64-x86-64"
> CONFIG_ARCH_DEFCONFIG="arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig"
> CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y
> CONFIG_GENERIC_CMOS_UPDATE=y
> CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG=y
> CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y
>
> ---
>
> So, to me it looks like (at least) one rpm did not load, yet the rpm -qa shows them
> as having loaded.
>
> I just went back and did a
>        sha256sum Fedora-11-X86_64-DVD.iso
> and it gave the correct checksum,
> however when I did
>        sha256sum /dev/cdrom
> to check the DVD, it did NOT give the correct checksum.
> Perhaps I should reburn the DVD ?  Or is this not the correct way to check the DVD ?
>
> In any case, any thoughts on my problem will be appreciated.
>
> --
>                                        Reg.Clemens
>                                        reg@xxxxxxx
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>

You should install glibc-devel.

-- 
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical
Engineering)
Alma Maters:
(1) Singapore Polytechnic
(2) National University of Singapore
My Primary Blog: http://teo-en-ming-aka-zhang-enming.blogspot.com
My Secondary Blog: http://enmingteo.wordpress.com
My Youtube videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/enmingteo
Email: space.time.universe@xxxxxxxxx
Mobile Phone (Starhub Prepaid): +65-8369-2618
Street: Bedok Reservoir Road
Country: Singapore

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux