On 10/14/2009 02:53 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 00:46 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 10/13/2009 07:14 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: >>> Someone recently mentioned gnote as a substitute for tomboy. So I >>> installed it. The two programs have essentially identical man pages. If >>> you add gnote to your panel you get the same icon as tomboy. Executing >>> both of then you get the same display. But looking at the program in >>> the /usr/bin directory gnote is much larger. I looked at the script for >>> tomboy and gnote is not mentioned. But tomboy appears throughout the >>> binary gnote. >>> >>> So, what is the scoop about these two programs? >> >> The size of either of these programs are fairly similar. The size for >> Gnote installed on my system is 4.1 MB vs 4.8 MB for Tomboy. You should >> also note that Tomboy pulls is a considerable amount of the Mono stack. > That is not the situation on my mazchine: > [akonstam@localhost bin]$ ls -l gnote tomboy > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1904064 2009-07-14 17:45 gnote > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1143 2009-07-01 11:03 tomboy > > So somethiong is very different on my machine than your machine. Can you > explain this? I don't see what is different. You are looking at ONE binary size. I am looking at the RPM size (and installed size) on the whole. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
