Re: kickstart -- refreshing rpm's.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



create a local mirror and you will be happy.


On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:07 PM, gary artim <gartim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Mike Cloaked <mike.cloaked@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> By the way there was one other thing I did to make sure that selinux should
>> work when I made the bind mount to the changed chroot area:
>>
>>
>> Mike Cloaked wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 1) I wanted to have the files in the /opt partition so as not to use up
>>> the limited space in the root partition so I did this, but it is not
>>> essential.
>>> Changed the directory where the mock files are going to be on the /opt
>>> partition
>>> As root:
>>> mkdir /opt/Local/mock
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Now make an equivalence of the security contexts for this new area to be the
>> same as the original by
>> semanage fcontext -a -e /var/lib/mock /opt/Local/mock
>> Then
>> restorecon /opt/Local/mock should give the same contexts as /var/lib/mock
>> and this can be checked using
>> ll -Z /opt/Local/mock
>> ll -Z /var/lib/mock
>>
>> Check the mock directory has the correct permissions
>>  ll -Zd /opt/Local/mock
>> drwxrwsr-x. root mock system_u:object_r:var_lib_t:s0   /opt/Local/mock
>>  ll -Zd /var/lib/mock
>> drwxrwsr-x. root mock system_u:object_r:var_lib_t:s0   /var/lib/mock
>>
>> Then the recipe is as I gave in the previous post.
>>
>> I ran the build with selinux enforcing and it seems to have worked just fine
>> - at least no AVCs popped up!
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/kickstart----refreshing-rpm%27s.-tp25811684p25824016.html
>> Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> --
>> fedora-list mailing list
>> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>>
>
> lotsa a great thoughts. My inital thought was that I could maybe mount
> OVER the current iso so when anaconda does the install it used the
> latest rpm. i may be barking up the wrong tree and anaconda may
> complain. I've read about filesystems that can be mounted with say a
> full image and then a file with changes that override the base system
> (forget the name). any thoughts on this or am I just creating work for
> myself?
>
> i could do it the %post way mentioned, just need to make the head node
> run nat in iptables. i didn't want to do that -- it will get slower as
> the release ages into obsolescence.  so maybe having an local update
> repo.
>
> thanks much for all the feed.
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>



-- 
------------

Itamar Reis Peixoto

e-mail/msn: itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
sip: itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
skype: itamarjp
icq: 81053601
+55 11 4063 5033
+55 34 3221 8599

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux