Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i'm putting together a tutorial on network services, and i'm really
uninterested in investing any time in covering NIS. anyone out there
still using it? is it worth it?
Answers: yes, and "probably not"
It's not that NIS isn't used, but that it is unlikely to be deployed other than
in a legacy organation, not a new use case. I personally think that the
wikipedia coverage is adequate, it lets people know it when they see it, and put
it in perspective. I think that's appropriate.
There are also many semi-standard offspring, NIS+, NIS with
{DES,AES,Blowfish,Serpent}, etc.
Cover LDAP instead. ;-)
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
