On 07Oct2009 09:38, Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: | Cameron Simpson: | >> I take the position that if the References field is not present in a | >> usenet article, it is not a followup. | | gilpel: | > I thought that Outlook didn't have this field but I rechecked ad can't | > find any. My error, I suppose. | | Outlook, and Outlook Express, are imfamous for stuffing up news and mail | for not using mail headers correctly. Do not use them as an example for | anything, other than *bad* examples. I'm sure they're a lot better than they used to be. If Outlook does threading (and I'm pretty sure it does; historicly once using some weird M$ Exchange specific method but these days...) then they should get the References stuff right. -- Cameron Simpson <cs@xxxxxxxxxx> DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ Microsoft Mail: as far from RFC-822 as you can get and still pretend to care. - Abby Franquemont-Guillory <abbyfg@xxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
