Fedora Users — Re: version GLIBC

Re: version GLIBC_2.0 not defined issue

Date Prev

Date Next

Thread Prev

Thread Next

Date Index

Thread Index

To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Subject: Re: version GLIBC_2.0 not defined issue

From: Yu Lex <lex.yucai.yu.fedora@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 02:10:04 +0800

In-reply-to: <200910011355.39438.markkuk@xxxxxxxxx>

References: <d345602e0909302038o2675b17ch3c1bcf11c0d47044@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200910011355.39438.markkuk@xxxxxxxxx>

Reply-to: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks a lot for your advise! I think I could understand the root-cause now, however, unfortunately I cannot get the source code and have the binaries only. Is there anything method to work around it? I heard there was some compatible library, is it workable?

Thanks,
Lex

2009/10/1 Markku Kolkka <markkuk@xxxxxxxxx>

Yu Lex kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika torstai, 1. lokakuuta
2009):

> Run a personal program "Track", and get error messages like
> "symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6
> with link time reference". Does anybody know to deal with this
> issue in Fedora 11?

Fix your source code and recompile. Find the source files that
use errno, add "#include <errno.h>" to those files and remove
any manual declarations of errno.

--
Markku Kolkka
markku.kolkka@xxxxxx

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines