Re: Question about installing the proprietary nvidia drivers with RPMFusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Hugh Caley <hughc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So I am using the proprietary nvidia drivers for my nvidia 6200 as provided
> by the RPMfusion distro and kmod.  Works fine.  However, evidently the
> nvidia card/system wants to use it's own version of libglx.so, which is
> located at
>
> /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/nvidia/libglx.so
>
> x11 wants to used a libglx.so located at
>
> /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so
>
> Couldn't get glx working unless I created the symlink
>
> /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so-->nvidia/libglx.so
>
> which is cool, although it took me a while to figure it out.
>
> Today I installed a couple of updates to xorg-x11:
>
>> xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.6.4-0.1.fc11           Tue 22 Sep 2009 05:33:21 PM
>> PDT
>> xorg-x11-server-common-1.6.4-0.1.fc11         Tue 22 Sep 2009 05:33:20 PM
>> PDT
>
> one of which overwrote my symlink with a new version of libglx.so, and I had
> to rename it and put in a new symlink.
>
> Am I doing this right?  It seems a little unstable.

I'm not sure if this would fix it but I use the same driver but my
xorg.conf has the following section which I assume gets it to load the
nvidia version instead of the xorg version:

Section "Files"
	ModulePath   "/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/nvidia"
	ModulePath   "/usr/lib64/xorg/modules"
EndSection


Does you're xorg.conf have something similar?

Richard

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux